concretesubmarine.com/ FORUM

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Structuralism


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 10
Date:
Structuralism
Permalink   
 


This possible connection between ontogeny and linguistic structuralism can be seen today even in previously unimaginable areas; in this case, in the areas of emotion and unconscious symbolism. Really, a long time ago, Barry (ch. ) has been engaged in what he calls "emotional speech," the function of which is to reinforce the continuously overused expressive power of everyday speech expression: but Barry's "stylistics" mainly points to the decomposition of the normative structure of language in emotional speech expression. On the contrary, we can ask ourselves: does emotion not have its own verbal expression? This is the hypothesis that Freud, under the influence of B1euler and Jung, finally defended after trying to explain symbolism in terms of camouflage. However, what Jung saw in symbolism was the "archetypes" of heredity, while Freud reasonably looked for the source of symbolism in the ontogeny of individuals. Here, then, we seem to be in a field not directly related to linguistics, although this field is obviously important for the function of signs and for general semiotics. But not, Lacan (J. As Lacan recently discovered for the first time, any psychoanalysis is verbal. There is, of course,Marble Granite Price, the speech of the analyser, but normally the analyser speaks very little; it is mainly the speech of the analysed, for whom the psychoanalytic process consists mainly in translating the unconscious symbols of the individual into the conscious speech of society. With this new idea as the center, Lacan, inspired by linguistic structuralism and the known mathematical model, strives to extract some new transformational structures to realize this seemingly impossible attempt: to bring the irrational things in the unconscious world and the inexpressible things symbolized by the heart into the speech model used to express the things that can be conveyed under normal circumstances. This is an attempt,Carrara Marble Slab, and the idea of such an attempt is certainly valuable in itself. However, it is difficult to analyze the results before they have been understood by the "laymen" in accordance with the meaning given by these psychoanalytic saviors (because, of course, it is necessary to understand the meaning of knowledge of the facts spoken by others, but a truth can only be understood if it is free from the influence of the aspects that produce it). wWw. xiAoshUotxt.cOm 16. The social formation, innate nature, or equilibration of linguistic structures Small, say, t, xt, day, Stone Honeycomb Panel ,Agate Slabs For Sale, don Chomsky is characterized by an interesting mixture of genetic and cartesianism, which makes it necessary for him to defend this idea, which is unexpected by contemporary linguists. This idea links Descartes' "innate" concept of the knife to heredity; According to some biologists, almost all mental life should be explained by this heredity: If it is true that the grammars of all kinds of natural speech are not only complex but also abstract, and that the different kinds of grammars are very limited, especially at the most highly abstract level, then. It seems that people generally regard these grammars as the fruits of culture in the acceptable sense of the term grammar, and whether this view is correct becomes a question again. It is very likely that a grammar is obtained by simple differentiation from a fixed schema of a gift (emphasis added by us), rather than by gradual accumulation of materials, language columns, language chains and new combinations.. And generally speaking, as long as we know a little about the structure of speech, we will believe that the hypothesis of rationalism has the greatest chance of being seen to be fruitful and, by and large, completely correct (pp. 20-21 of the French version of the article quoted above). Thus, we are faced with a hypothesis that most authors have not shown, because their structuralist tendencies prompt them to doubt any psychogenesis and any historical determinism, but do not therefore approve of pushing structure to the essence of super-experience. Chomsky, who is both experimental and formal, takes a much more measured position, because individual grammars differentiate according to the transformational processes at work in their development: the innate part is then the core, the "fixed schema" and the universal formal structure of transformation. Their variability belongs to the "creative" aspect emphasized by him and Harris in speech acts. However, we still face a basic problem, that is, the problem of "fixed schema of talent", which needs to be examined from different aspects. The first is the biological aspect. If any trait is thought to be hereditary, explain how it came to be. To understand how cortical speech centers emerge in the process of humanization is already a rather puzzling problem: it is not enough to explain them by mutation and natural selection, especially because they involve a mainly innate activity of communication between individuals. If the gene responsible for speech expression is to be genetically responsible not only for transmitting the ability to obtain speech expression from the outside world, but also for having a fixed and formative schema, thus producing language itself, the problem will naturally become more complex. Moreover, if this formative core is also charged with "reason", it should be admitted that reason is also hereditary, so there are only two reasonable answers (because, let us insist on this point, simply talking about mutation and selection,Nero Marquina Marble Slab, without any objective material as a basis, we can only give two reasonable answers. This is like what Beidalangfei said about asking for help from the "Tibetan prayer Muduo"), or the preformation that has always existed (but why do we have to wait for the appearance of human beings in order to make the preformation manifest? Isn't a chimpanzee or a bee already a good thing? Or the interaction with the environment that causes selection to be imposed on the phenotypic response that becomes the "response" of the genome to the action of an external stimulus. forustone.com



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard